If 2017 is your year to get active, a change of scenery could help you hit that goal.
When it comes to cities that promote active lifestyles, not all are created equal across the US.
WalletHub pulled together a report on the worst and best cities for an active lifestyle.
To measure which cities were active, the personal finance website looked at everything from monthly membership fees to how many facilities a city had, how many residents were inactive, and how many people played in team sports.
Here's what they found, assigning each of the 100 cities with scores up to 100.
SEE ALSO: Nutrition experts got together and ranked the best diets of 2017 — here are the top 12
DON'T MISS: The definitive, scientific answers to 20 health questions everyone has
But first, those that scored the worst.
Among the worst places for an active lifestyle were Memphis, Tennessee; Laredo, Texas; North Las Vegas, Nevada; Dallas, Texas; and New York.
New York in particular ranked the lowest when it came to how much things cost, as well as how tricky it might be to participate in group activities. Laredo, on the other hand, had the lowest access to facilities or outdoor areas for recreation.
10. Sacramento, California
Sacramento ranked highly in its amount of sports facilities and outdoor activities, placing it in the top ten of the best cities to have active lifestyles.
Active Lifestyle Score: 52.13
9. Irvine, California
Down in southern California, Irvine had the best score of the 100 cities when it came to how much things cost and how many opportunities there were to participate in activities.
Active Lifestyle Score: 52.28
See the rest of the story at Business Insider